Cite as: L. Savard; 2010; Scaling up infrastructure spending in the philippines: A cge top-down bottom-up microsimulation approach; International Journal of Microsimulation; 3(1); 43–59. doi: 10.34196/ijm.00024
Abstract
In this paper we use a top-down bottom-up CGE microsimulation model with endogenous labour supply and unemployment to explore the impact of scaling up infrastructure spending in the Philippines. In the current debate on the importance of scaling up infrastructure to stimulate growth, some analysts raise concerns about potential negative macroeconomic impacts (Dutch disease). This study aims to provide some insight into this debate by extending the analysis to include distributional analysis. We draw from the infrastructure productivity literature to postulate positive productive externalities of new infrastructure and from Fay and Yepes (2003) to include operating and maintenance costs associated with new infrastructure. We investigate two fiscal tools and foreign aid as mechanisms to fund the new infrastructure and associated costs. The distributional analysis is performed with FGT indices and growth incidence curves. Our results reveal that infrastructure spending reduces poverty. Foreign aid is shown to be the most equitable funding mechanism, whereas a value added tax provides the strongest poverty reduction.
This article contains 5 figures and 8 tables.
Figures
Figure 1. Labour market representation.Figure 2. Resolution procedure of the TD/BU approach.Figure 3. Income growth curve: VAT-funded productive infrastructure.Figure 4. Income growth curve: income tax funded productive infrastructure.Figure 5. Income growth curve: foreign-aid funded productive infrastructure.
Tables
Table 1. Macroeconomic results (% variations).
Value added tax
Income tax
Foreign Aid
Definition
Base
Non productive investment
Productive investment
Non productive investment
Productive investment
Non productive investment
Productive investment
Household income
86,476.9
0.15
0.74
0.17
0.75
0.14
0.73
Household savings
9,651.8
−2.20
−3.24
−1.98
−2.99
−3.41
−4.21
Informal Wage Government
0.5
0.43
0.98
0.49
1.05
0.39
0.94
income
20,367
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
3.94
Firms’ income Government
26,172.9
−0.14
0.52
−0.17
0.49
−0.17
0.51
savings Government
13,369
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
30.00
expenditure Private
16,818.8
2.38
2.38
2.38
2.38
2.38
2.38
investment
23,161.2
−1.23
−0.54
−1.86
−1.07
−1.54
−0.82
Firms’ savings
7,810.5
0,00
0.95
−0.31
0.90
−0.30
0.92
Unemployment rate
16.8
−1.05
−1.95
−1.14
−1.95
−0.9
−1.84
Nominal exchange rate
1
0.69
0.39
0.06
−0.13
−1.20
−1.18
Gross domestic product
1,04,510.7
0.16
0.79
0.17
0.80
0.15
0.79
Source: Values computed by the author.
Table 2. Sectoral results: rental rate of capital (% variation).