1. Taxes and benefits
Download icon

Taxation of closely held corporations – efficiency aspects

  1. Peter Ericson  Is a corresponding author
  2. Johan Fall  Is a corresponding author
  1. Confederation of Swedish Enterprise, Sweden
Research article
Cite this article as: P. Ericson, J. Fall; 2011; Taxation of closely held corporations – efficiency aspects; International Journal of Microsimulation; 4(2); 27-40. doi: 10.34196/ijm.00051
11 figures and 5 tables

Figures

Schematic illustration of old and new rules in Sweden Marginal tax rate.
Solvency margin and liquidity in CHC’s and WHC’s.
Profitability in CHC’s and WHC’s.
Average interest on debt.
Establishments and disappearances.
Employees.
Owners background.
Dividends and capital gains.
Increasing standard amount and number of new CHC owners.
Decreasing capital tax and number of new CHC owners.
Reduction of pay roll tax and number of new CHC owners.

Tables

Table 1
Average tax _ rates and size of alternative forms of organisations in SWEDEN 2005.
Sole propriatorship CHC WHC privat WHC public
Distribution of wages and dividens Distribution of dividends Distribution of wages and dividens Distribution of dividends
Number of firms 735,917 190,981 96,638 339
AETR (%) 55.4 31.8 24.3 27.3 27.6 32
RAETR(%) 60.1 34.5 26.3 29.6 30 34.7
Turnover (MSEK) 181,602 1,143,356 4,218,370 158,377
Wage bill (MSEK) 8,381 180,418 448,064 16,663
Number of employees 49,017 692,719 1,491,231 79,725
Table 2
Number of observations.
Year Closely held corporations Widely held corporations
2001 167,069 42,526
2002 171,550 38,718
2003 173,980 37,329
2004 179,884 35,976
2005 185,568 35,061
2006 189,178 37,395
2007 190,097 40,748
Table 3
Statistics on variables in a model aiming to explain the probability of becoming a CHC owner.
Variable
New CHC owner in 2006 (dependent variable) 0.9%
Sole propriator/partnership last year 7.9%
Avarage difference in disposable income (TSEK/YEAR) 5.0
Woman 50.2%
Age < 30 9.3%
Single 22.4%
Born in Sweden 86.9%
Living in a large city 34.4%
University degree 19.8%
Table 4
Probit estimates of the probability to become a CHC owner.
Parameter Estimate P-value
Inte rcept −2.5002 <.0001
Sole propriator/partnership last year 0.3729 <.0001
Difference in disposable income 0.00538 <.0001
Woman −0.2528 <.0001
Age < 30 −0.1446 <.0001
Single −0.1535 <.0001
Born in Sweden 0.179 <.0001
Living in a large city 0.1476 <.0001
Unive rsity degree −0.0512 0.0095
Discriminatory power 0.35 Somers’ D
Table 5
Disposable income elasticities to become a CHC owner.
Hourly wage rate (decile) Average hourly wage rate (SEK) Elasticity
All 156 0.07
1 95 0.01
2 111 0.01
3 120 0.01
4 127 0.01
5 135 0.02
6 144 0.03
7 156 0.06
8 172 0.11
9 200 0.17
10 301 0.24

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)