Fiscal Inclusive Development: Micro Simulation Models For Latin America, by C. Urzúa (2012)
Cite this article
as: M. Maes; 2013; Fiscal Inclusive Development: Micro Simulation Models For Latin America, by C. Urzúa (2012); International Journal of Microsimulation; 6(3); 118-121.
doi: 10.34196/ijm.00090
Tables
Table 1
Summary of chapters of the book.
| Chapter | Type model | National survey (data, year) | Country | Simulated reform and output | Software |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AR+BE (consumer demand) | PNAD (Y, 2009) + POF (X, 2008–2009) | Brazil | Impact reform (social benefit, indirect tax) on poverty/inequality | Stata |
| 2 | AR | CASEN (Y, 2009) + EPF (X, 2006–2007) | Chile | Impact reform (indirect tax, direct tax) on poverty/inequality budget | Stata |
| 3 | AR + BE (labour supply) | CASEN (Y, 2009) | Chile | Impact reform (social transfer, work subsidy) on labour supply/poverty/inequality | |
| 4 | AR | ECOVI (X = Y, 2006) | Guatemala | Progressivity/No reform simulated | Excel |
| 5 | AR | ENIGH (Y + X, 2008) | Mexico | Impact reform (indirect tax) on inequality | Excel |
| 6 | AR + BE (consumer demand) | ENIGH (Y + X, 2008) | Mexico | Impact reform (indirect tax) on marginal social cost | Stata |
| 7 | AR | HS (Y, 2008) + ES (X, 2005–2006) | Uruguay | Impact reform (indirect tax, direct tax) on progressivity/inequality/budget | Stata |
| 8 | AR + BE (consumer demand) | HS (Y, 2008) + EX (X, 2005–2006) | Uruguay | Impact reform (indirect tax) on progressivity/inequality/budget | Stata |
-
Note: AR = arithmetic; BE = behavioural; Y = income, X = expenditure.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.