1. Taxes and benefits
Download icon

The redistribution effect of taxation in emerging economies: Evidence from a microsimulation exercise in Zambia

  1. Mwale Evaristo  Is a corresponding author
  2. Zurika Robinson
  1. PhD Graduate and Researh Fellow, Department of Economics, University of South Africa, South Africa
  2. Full professor, Department of Economics, University of South Africa, South Africa
Research article
Cite this article as: M. Evaristo, Z. Robinson; 2026; The redistribution effect of taxation in emerging economies: Evidence from a microsimulation exercise in Zambia; International Journal of Microsimulation; 19(1); 1-32. doi: 10.34196/ijm.00333
8 figures and 16 tables

Figures

The trends for the tax-to-GPD ratio, Gini index, and absolute poverty, 1995–2020.

Source: constructed by the author using data from ZRA and ZamStats.

Poverty trends in Zambia, 2006, 2010 and 2015 .

Source: constructed by the author using the 2006, 2010, and 2015 LCMS.

Income share across the population distribution 1996–2015.

Source: constructed by the author using data from ZAMSTATS (see also International Growth Centre, 2017).

Structure of public tax revenues in Zambia, 2010–2019.

Source: constructed by the author using ZRA data.

Tax revenues by selected tax type as a percentage of GDP.

Source: author’s elaboration of data from ZRA.

Contributions of different taxes to simulated tax revenue in Zambia, 2010–2019.

Source: constructed by the author based on MicroZAMOD simulations.

Contributions of different taxes to the national consumption-based severe poverty rate in Zambia, 2010–2019.

Source: author’s elaboration based on MicroZAMOD simulations.

Research process flow.

Source: constructed by the author.

Tables

Table 1
Effects of taxes on the Gini coefficient.
201020152016201720182019
Consumption-based Gini before taxes57.0357.1655.6354.9955.1155.22
Effect of PIT-2.35-1.02-1.29-1.37-1.22-1.51
Effect of TOT+0.09+0.13+0.11-0.12-0.11+0.15
Effect of VAT-0.29-0.34-0.38-0.42-0.41-0.42
Effect of Excise Duties-0.15-0.16-0.15-0.15-0.14-0.13
Consumption-based Gini after taxes54.3355.7853.9252.9453.2353.30
Contribution shares
Effect of PIT-87.2%-73.9%-75.1%-66.7%-64.8%-78.8%
Effect of TOT+3.5%+9.7%+6.5%-5.6%-6.1%+7.7%
Effect of VAT-10.9%-24.5%-22.4%-20.5%-21.7%-21.9%
Effect of Excise Duties-5.4%-11.4%-9.0%-7.2%-7.4%-7.0%
Effect of all taxes on consumption-based Gini-100%-100%-100%-100%-100%-100%
  1. Source: author’s elaboration based on MicroZAMOD simulations.

Table 2
Cost-effectiveness of different taxes in terms of changes in poverty.
201020152016201720182019
Effect of PIT+0.12 pp.+0.01 pp.+0.03 pp.+0.03 pp.+0.01 pp.+0.04 pp.
Effect of TOT+0.28 pp.+0.20 pp.+0.14 pp.+0.03 pp.+0.02 pp.+0.28 pp.
Effect of VAT+0.78 pp.+0.49 pp.+0.53 pp.+0.49 pp.+0.53 pp.+0.45 pp.
Effect of Excise Duties+0.03 pp.+0.01 pp.+0.01 pp.+0.02 pp.+0.01 pp.+0.02 pp.
  1. Source: author’s elaboration based on MicroZAMOD simulations.

  2. Note: the cells indicate the increase in the national poverty rate (in percentage points) associated with raising 1 billion Kwacha of revenue from a specific tax. Larger estimates (red) hence point to cases where raising tax revenue leads to larger relative increases in poverty.

Table 3
Cost-effectiveness of different taxes in terms of changes in the Gini index.
201020152016201720182019
Effect of PIT-0.95 pp.-0.41 pp.-0.52 pp.-0.55 pp.-0.49 pp.-0.60 pp.
Effect of TOT+0.04 pp.+0.05 pp.+0.04 pp.-0.05 pp.-0.05 pp.+0.06 pp.
Effect of VAT-0.12 pp.-0.14 pp.-0.15 pp.-0.17 pp.-0.16 pp.-0.17 pp.
Effect of Excise Duties-0.06 pp.-0.06 pp.-0.06 pp.-0.06 pp.-0.06 pp.-0.05 pp.
  1. Source: author’s elaboration based on MicroZAMOD simulations

  2. Note: the cells indicate the change in the Gini coefficient (in percentage points) associated with raising 1 billion Kwacha of revenue from a specific tax. Larger estimates (red) hence point to cases where raising tax revenue leads to larger relative increases in the Gini.

Table 4
Baseline and proposed policy reforms.
ParameterBaselineReform 1Reform 2Reform 3Reform 4
PAYE/PIT Band 161,200–85,20061,200–90,000Same as baseline61,200–90,00066,000-92,400
PAYE/PIT Band 1 Rate20.0%25.0 %25.0 %25.0%
PAYE/PIT Band 285,200–110,40090,000–144,400Same as baseline90,000–144,40092,400-130,000
PAYE/PIT Band 2 Rate30%34.0%34.0%33%
PAYE/PIT Band 3Over 110,400Over 144,400Same as baselineOver 144,400Over 144,000
PAYE/PIT Band 3 Rate37.0%37.5%37.5%38%
Clear beer excise duty
(ad valorem rate)
40.0%Same as baseline65.0%65.0%65%
Wine and spirits excise duty
(ad valorem rate)
60.0%Same as baseline80.0%80.0%80%
Opaque beer excise duty
(Kwacha per litre)
0.25Same as baseline0.60.60.6
Tobacco excise duty
(Kwacha per single piece)
0.4Same as baseline0.750.750.75
VAT rate16%15.0%15.5%15.0%15.5%
Turnover Tax Upper Limit800,000Same as baselineSame as baselineSame as baseline1,200,00
Turnover Tax Rate4%Same as baselineSame as baselineSame as baseline5.5%
  1. Source: constructed by the author using ZRA practice notes.

  2. Source: note that PIT/PAYE rates for those under the first band are 0% (e.g. those earning under K61,200 in the baseline). Only parameters that are changed in one or more of the scenarios are included.

Table 5
Simulation results of the hypothetical policy reforms.
BaselineReform 1Reform 2Reform 3Reform 4
ResultsResultsChangeResultsChangeResultsChangeResultsChange
Tax-benefit policy (million Kwacha)
Government revenue15,043.5915,048.13+4.5415,039.18-4.4115,177.14+133.5515,569.14+525.55
... direct taxes5,074.755,347.25+272.505,074.750.005,347.25+272.505,613.22+538.47
... indirect taxes4,688.624,420.66-267.964,684.21-4.414,549.67-138.954,675.70-12.92
... social security contributions5,280.235,280.230.005,280.230.005,280.230.005,280.230.00
Gov. expenditure on social transfers3,964.933,964.930.003,964.930.004,095.06+130.144,485.48+520.55
Poverty
Share of poor population, in %, FGT (0)41.72***
(0.0069)
41.70***
(0.0072)
-0.0341.70***
(0.0068)
-0.0241.56***
(0.0074)
-0.1641.54***
(0.0068)
-0.18
... male-headed households41.8041.78-0.0241.79-0.0241.71-0.0941.85+0.05
... female-headed households41.4041.36-0.0441.37-0.0340.95-0.4540.27-1.12
... households with children43.1543.13-0.0243.14-0.0243.00-0.1643.05-0.11
... households with older persons46.0246.00-0.0246.020.0045.39-0.6344.13-1.89
Poverty gap, FGT (1)00000000.000.00
Inequality and household income
Gini coefficient (0–100)54.24***
(0.0044)
54.19***
(0.0046)
-0.0654.24***
(0.0046)
-0.0154.08***
(0.0045)
-0.1653.96***
(0.0046)
-0.003
P80/P20 ratio4.984.980.004.980.004.95-0.034.90-0.08
Quantiles of distribution and median
20th1,764.991,766.71+1.721,766.28+1.281,777.85+12.861,792.14+27.15
40th2,978.382,986.27+7.892,979.90+1.522,994.20+15.823,012.41+34.03
50th3,812.193,818.94+6.753,815.05+2.853,828.21+16.023,839.29+27.10
60th4,934.124,947.87+13.754,933.12-1.004,941.18+7.064,950.22+16.10
80th8,781.778,791.08+9.318,790.14+8.378,798.51+16.748,778.92-2.86
Absolute national poverty line, per year3,127.683,127.68-3,127.68-3,127.68-3,128.000.00
  1. Standard errors in parentheses. * p < 0.10, ** p <0.05, *** p <0.01

  2. Source: constructed by the author based on MicroZAMOD simulations.

Table A1
Baseline and proposed policy reforms.
ParameterBaselineReform 1Reform 2Reform 3Reform 4
Turnover Tax Upper Limit800,000Same as baselineSame as baselineSame as baseline1,200,00
Turnover Tax Rate4%Same as baselineSame as baselineSame as baseline5.5%
VAT rate16%15.0%15.5%15.0%15.5%
Opaque beer excise duty
(Kwacha per litre)
0.25Same as baseline0.60.60.6
Clear beer excise duty
(ad valorem rate)
40.0%Same as baseline65.0%65.0%65%
Tobacco excise duty
(Kwacha per single piece)
0.4Same as baseline0.750.750.75
Wine and spirits excise duty
(ad valorem rate)
60.0%Same as baseline80.0%80.0%80%
PAYE/PIT Band 161,200–85,20061,200–90,000Same as baseline61,200–90,00066,000-92,400
PAYE/PIT Band 1 Rate20.0%25.0 %25.0 %25.0%
PAYE/PIT Band 285,200–110,40090,000–144,400Same as baseline90,000–144,40092,400-130,000
PAYE/PIT Band 2 Rate30%34.0%34.0%33%
PAYE/PIT Band 3Over 110,400Over 144,400Same as baselineOver 144,400Over 130,000
PAYE/PIT Band 3 Rate37.0%37.5%37.5%38%
Table A2
Simulation results of the hypothetical policy reforms.
BaselineReform 1Reform 2Reform 3Reform 4
ResultsResultsChangeResultsChangeResultsChangeResultsChange
Tax-benefit policy (million Kwacha)
Government revenue15,043.5915,048.13+4.5415,039.18-4.4115,177.14+133.5515,569.14+525.55
... direct taxes5,074.755,347.25+272.505,074.750.005,347.25+272.505,613.22+538.47
... indirect taxes4,688.624,420.66-267.964,684.21-4.414,549.67-138.954,675.70-12.92
... social security contributions5,280.235,280.230.005,280.230.005,280.230.005,280.230.00
Gov. expenditure on social transfers3,964.933,964.930.003,964.930.004,095.06+130.144,485.48+520.55
Poverty
Share of poor population, in %, FGT (0)41.7241.70-0.0341.70-0.0241.56-0.1641.54-0.18
... male-headed households41.8041.78-0.0241.79-0.0241.71-0.0941.85+0.05
... female-headed households41.4041.36-0.0441.37-0.0340.95-0.4540.27-1.12
... households with children43.1543.13-0.0243.14-0.0243.00-0.1643.05-0.11
... households with older persons46.0246.00-0.0246.020.0045.39-0.6344.13-1.89
Poverty gap, FGT (1)00000000.000.00
Inequality and household income
Gini coefficient (0–100)54.2454.19-0.0654.24-0.0154.08-0.160.5396-0.0029
P80/P20 ratio4.984.980.004.980.004.95-0.034.90-0.08
Quantiles of distribution and median
20th1,764.991,766.71+1.721,766.28+1.281,777.85+12.861,792.14+27.15
40th2,978.382,986.27+7.892,979.90+1.522,994.20+15.823,012.41+34.03
50th3,812.193,818.94+6.753,815.05+2.853,828.21+16.023,839.29+27.10
60th4,934.124,947.87+13.754,933.12-1.004,941.18+7.064,950.22+16.10
80th8,781.778,791.08+9.318,790.14+8.378,798.51+16.748,778.92-2.86
Absolute national poverty line, per year3,127.683,127.68-3,127.68-3,127.68-3,128.000.00
Table A3
Complex survey estimates of Generalized Entropy inequality indices.
BaselineGE(-1)1.0493840.04761922.040.0000.9560521.142715
MLD0.5428510.01000554.260.0000.5232410.56246
Theil0.5897160.01485939.690.0000.5605930.618838
GE(2)1.3741820.09998413.740.0001.1782181.570147
GE(3)10.134232.161614.690.0005.89755514.37091
Reform 1GE(-1)1.0454560.04742322.050.0000.9525091.138402
MLD0.5416280.01000654.130.0000.5220160.56124
Theil0.5887910.01489839.520.0000.5595910.617991
GE(2)1.3747850.10043913.690.0001.1779281.571641
GE(3)10.180342.1772924.680.0005.91292814.44776
Reform 2GE(-1)1.0482090.04752422.060.0000.9550641.141353
MLD0.5426270.0154.260.0000.5230290.562226
Theil0.5894020.01484239.710.0000.5603120.618493
GE(2)1.3714180.09957913.770.0001.1762471.56659
GE(3)10.071792.1430494.70.0005.87149614.27209
Reform 3GE(-1)1.0300260.04673722.040.0000.9384221.121629
MLD0.538540.00995854.080.0000.5190220.558059
Theil0.586380.01485139.480.0000.5572730.615487
GE(2)1.3666590.09970213.710.0001.1712461.562072
GE(3)10.064182.1488574.680.0005.85249314.27586
Reform 4GE(-1)1.000020.04559321.930.0000.9106591.089381
MLD0.5342320.00990253.950.0000.5148260.553639
Theil0.5842060.01481239.440.0000.5551750.613236
GE(2)1.3617150.09926413.720.0001.1671621.556269
GE(3)9.9984772.1296154.690.0005.82450714.17245
  1. (Number of obs = 12250, Number of strata = 1, Number of PSUs= 12250, Population size=15473850)

  2. GE(-1): Focuses on inequality among the poorest.

  3. MLD (Mean Log Deviation): Measures lower-end inequality (α = 0).

  4. Theil: Includes:

  5. · Theil T (GE(1)): Entire income distribution.

  6. · Theil L (GE(0)): Same as MLD.

  7. GE(2): Highlights inequality among the wealthiest.

  8. GE(3): Stronger emphasis on top-end inequality

Table A4
Complex survey estimates of Atkinson inequality indices.
IndexEstimateStd.Err.zP>|z|[95% Conf.Interval]
BaselineA(0.5)0.2445440.00438455.780.0000.2359520.253136
A(1)0.4189110.00581472.050.0000.4075160.430306
A(1.5)0.5557070.0069679.840.0000.5420650.569348
A(2)0.6772910.00991868.290.0000.6578520.69673
A(2.5)0.7904980.01349858.570.0000.7640430.816953
Reform 1A(0.5)0.2441030.00439255.580.0000.2354950.252711
A(1)0.41820.00582271.840.0000.406790.42961
A(1.5)0.5548940.00696679.650.0000.541240.568547
A(2)0.6764710.00992868.140.0000.6570130.695928
A(2.5)0.7898010.01354758.30.0000.7632490.816353
Reform 2A(0.5)0.2444560.00438255.790.0000.2358690.253044
A(1)0.4187810.00581272.060.0000.407390.430172
A(1.5)0.5555270.00695779.850.0000.5418920.569163
A(2)0.6770460.00991368.30.0000.6576160.696476
A(2.5)0.7902290.0135158.490.0000.763750.816708
Reform 3A(0.5)0.2430930.00438255.470.0000.2345050.251682
A(1)0.4164010.00581271.650.0000.405010.427791
A(1.5)0.5523320.00695579.420.0000.5387010.565963
A(2)0.6732080.00998267.440.0000.6536430.692773
A(2.5)0.7866930.01389156.630.0000.7594660.813919
Reform 4A(0.5)0.241930.00437355.320.0000.2333580.250501
A(1)0.4138810.00580471.320.0000.4025060.425256
A(1.5)0.5481510.00696678.690.0000.5344980.561803
A(2)0.6666710.01013265.80.0000.6468140.686529
A(2.5)0.7769820.01415754.880.0000.7492340.80473
  1. (Number of obs = 12250, Number of strata = 1, Number of PSUs = 12250, Population size = 15473850)

  2. A(0.5): Moderate sensitivity to lower-end inequality.

  3. A(1): Stronger focus on lower-end disparities.

  4. A(1.5): Increased inequality aversion.

  5. A(2): High sensitivity to the poorest individuals.

  6. A(2.5): Extreme focus on lower-end inequality.

Table A5
Bootstrap results robustness checks for Poverty incidence.
ObservedBootstrapNormal-base
[95% Conf.Interval]
coefficientstd.errzP>|z|
Baselinefgt0[1]0.41721890.00689460.520.0000.4037060.430731
fgt10.18040080.00356250.650.0000.1734190.187382
fgt20.10230880.00256339.930.0000.0972860.107331
Reform 1fgt00.41706190.00715258.320.0000.4030450.431079
fgt10.17990280.00359250.080.0000.1728630.186943
fgt20.10196930.00250140.760.0000.0970670.106872
Reform 2fgt00.41704220.00684860.90.0000.403620.430465
fgt10.18032690.00372648.390.0000.1730230.18763
fgt20.10224650.0026538.590.0000.0970530.10744
Reform 3fgt00.41568180.00740256.160.0000.4011740.43019
fgt10.1787040.00378447.220.0000.1712870.186121
fgt20.10097850.00263938.260.0000.0958050.106152
Reform 4fgt00.41544260.00679561.140.0000.4021250.42876
fgt10.17666340.00345351.160.0000.1698950.183432
fgt20.09931680.00244540.620.0000.0945240.104109
  1. (Number of obs = 12,251, Replications =250, (Replications based on 12,251 clusters in idhh)

Table A6
Bootstrap results robustness check for Inequality Indices.
ObservedBootstrapNormal-based
[95%- Conf.Interval]
coefficientSt. ErrzP>|z|
Baselinegini0.5424170.004442122.110.0000.5337110.551123
ge00.5428510.00970555.940.0000.523830.561871
Reform 1gini0.5418550.004571118.550.0000.5328960.550814
ge00.5416280.01021853.010.0000.5216020.561654
Reform 2gini0.5423410.004584118.320.0000.5333570.551325
ge00.5426270.00994554.560.0000.5231360.562119
Refrom 3gini0.5407780.004539119.130.0000.5318820.549675
ge00.538540.01020252.790.0000.5185460.558535
Refrom 4gini0.5395610.00461117.060.0000.5305270.548596
ge00.5342320.0100753.050.0000.5144960.553969
  1. Number of obs = 12,251, Replications=250, (Replications based on 12,251 clusters in idhh)

  2. fgt0: Proportion of people below the poverty line (headcount ratio).

  3. fgt1: Average income shortfall below the poverty line (poverty gap).

  4. fgt2: Emphasizes severe poverty by weighing larger shortfalls more heavily.

  5. gini: Measures overall income inequality (0 = equality, 1 = inequality).

  6. ge(0): Focuses on lower-end inequality; also called Mean Log Deviation (MLD).

Table A7
Quantile group shares, cumulative shares (Lorenz ordinates), generalized Lorenz ordinates, and Gini (Baseline).
Group
Share
Linearized
Std.Err
EstimatezP>|z|[95% Conf.Interval]
10.0112320.00033333.7310.0000.0105790.011885
20.021850.00042151.8780.0000.0210240.022675
30.0302840.00049760.9840.0000.0293110.031258
40.0389590.00062562.3480.0000.0377340.040184
50.0503310.00076865.4990.0000.0488250.051837
60.0645660.00095267.8290.0000.0627010.066432
70.084330.00115573.0080.0000.0820660.086594
80.1112150.0014377.7860.0000.1084130.114017
90.1648390.0022174.5930.0000.1605070.16917
100.4223950.00554376.2010.0000.411530.433259
Cumul.
share
10.0112320.00033333.7310.0000.0105790.011885
20.0330820.00069847.4110.0000.0317140.034449
30.0633660.00112456.3990.0000.0611640.065568
40.1023250.00164562.1850.0000.09910.10555
50.1526560.00228366.8680.0000.1481810.15713
60.2172220.00302771.750.0000.2112880.223156
70.3015520.00388177.7030.0000.2939460.309158
80.4127670.00474487.0010.0000.4034680.422066
90.5776050.005543104.2010.0000.5667410.58847
101
Gen.
Lorenz
175.592.1834.6720.00071.31779.863
2222.6374.41450.4410.000213.986231.287
3426.4476.95961.2770.000412.807440.088
4688.63910.44465.9390.000668.17709.108
51027.36315.06568.1940.000997.8361056.891
61461.89121.22668.8720.0001420.2881503.493
72029.42729.06969.8130.0001972.4522086.402
82777.89639.31270.6620.0002700.8462854.947
93887.2556.3269.0210.0003776.8653997.634
106729.9498.55468.2870.0006536.7776923.102
Gini0.542420.004598117.97100.5334080.551431
  1. Number of orbs = 12251, Population size=154,739,35.69, Design df=1225)

Table A8
Quantile group shares, cumulative shares (Lorenz ordinates), generalized Lorenz ordinates, and Gini (Reform 1).
Group shareLinearized
Std.Err
EstimatezP>|z|[95% Conf.Interval]
10.0112340.00033433.6760.0000.010580.011888
20.0219010.00042152.0420.0000.0210760.022726
30.0303620.00049860.9390.0000.0293860.031339
40.0389880.00062762.1840.0000.0377590.040217
50.0506210.00076965.80.0000.0491130.052129
60.0646140.00095667.5680.0000.062740.066488
70.0840860.0011573.1420.0000.0818330.08634
80.1115350.00143577.7420.0000.1087230.114347
90.1646790.00219475.0490.0000.1603780.16898
100.421980.00555475.9760.0000.4110940.432866
Cumul.
share
10.0112340.00033433.6760.0000.010580.011888
20.0331350.00069847.4760.0000.0317670.034503
30.0634970.00112556.4220.0000.0612910.065703
40.1024850.00164962.1580.0000.0992530.105716
50.1531050.00228866.9260.0000.1486220.157589
60.2177190.00303471.7520.0000.2117720.223666
70.3018060.00388577.6810.0000.2941910.30942
80.4133410.00475187.0020.0000.4040290.422652
90.578020.005554104.070.0000.5671340.588906
101
Gen.
Lorenz
175.6082.18534.6050.00071.32679.89
2223.0084.41250.540.000214.36231.656
3427.3556.96961.320.000413.696441.015
4689.75810.47365.8630.000669.232710.284
51030.45315.08868.2970.0001000.8821060.025
61465.32721.28768.8370.0001423.6051507.048
72031.25929.06969.8770.0001974.2842088.233
82781.92939.33970.7170.0002704.8262859.031
93890.27856.18269.2440.0003780.1634000.393
106730.35498.54968.2940.0006537.2016923.508
Gini0.5418580.004608117.5900.5328260.550889
  1. (Number of obs = 12251, Population size = 15,473,935.69, Design df =12250)

Table A9
Quantile group shares, cumulative shares (Lorenz ordinates), generalized Lorenz ordinates, and Gini (Reform 2).
Group
Share
EstimateLinearized
Std.Err
zP>|z|[95% Conf.Interval]
10.0112430.00033333.7310.0000.010590.011897
20.0218540.00042151.8910.0000.0210280.022679
30.0303090.00049661.0490.0000.0293360.031282
40.0389140.00062562.2770.0000.037690.040139
50.0503350.00076965.4860.0000.0488290.051842
60.0644840.00094967.9150.0000.0626230.066345
70.08420.00115472.9730.0000.0819390.086462
80.1115540.00143577.7250.0000.1087410.114367
90.1650980.00218575.5480.0000.1608150.169381
100.4220080.00554876.0580.0000.4111330.432883
Cumul.
share
10.0112430.00033333.7310.0000.010590.011897
20.0330970.00069847.4180.0000.0317290.034465
30.0634060.00112356.440.0000.0612040.065608
40.102320.00164562.1870.0000.0990950.105545
50.1526560.00228366.8650.0000.1481810.15713
60.2171390.00302671.7620.0000.2112090.22307
70.301340.00387977.6830.0000.2937370.308942
80.4128940.00474587.0260.0000.4035950.422193
90.5779920.005548104.1710.0000.5671170.588867
101
Gen.
Lorenz
175.6712.18334.670.00071.39379.949
2222.7524.41650.4420.000214.097231.407
3426.7386.9661.310.000413.096440.38
4688.64210.4565.9020.000668.161709.123
51027.41215.07968.1370.000997.8591056.966
61461.40621.21968.8740.0001419.8181502.994
72028.09629.05269.8090.0001971.1552085.037
82778.88439.34670.6270.0002701.7672856
93890.03956.1369.3050.0003780.0274000.051
106730.26798.52768.3090.0006537.1586923.376
Gini0.5423430.004597117.980.0000.5333340.551353
  1. (Number of obs = 10344, Population size = 13165710.22, Design df = 10343)

Table A10
Quantile group shares, cumulative shares (Lorenz ordinates), generalized Lorenz ordinates, and Gini (Reform 3).
Group shareEstimateLinearized
Std.Er
zP>|z|[95% Conf.Interval]
10.0113650.00033334.1240.0000.0107120.012018
20.0220420.00042451.9510.0000.021210.022874
30.0304940.00049761.3370.0000.0295190.031468
40.0391520.00062862.3650.0000.0379210.040382
50.0505830.00076965.7940.0000.0490760.05209
60.0646470.00094768.2540.0000.0627910.066504
70.0846880.00115973.0420.0000.0824150.08696
80.111280.0014377.8270.0000.1084770.114082
90.1645830.00217375.7260.0000.1603230.168843
100.4211670.00554975.8990.0000.4102910.432043
Cumul.
share
1
0.0113650.00033334.1240.0000.0107120.012018
20.0334070.00070147.6830.0000.0320340.03478
30.06390.00112756.7080.0000.0616920.066109
40.1030520.00165162.4150.0000.0998160.106288
50.1536350.00228967.1220.0000.1491490.158121
60.2182830.00303172.0230.0000.2123420.224223
70.302970.00388777.9520.0000.2953530.310588
80.414250.00474787.2640.0000.4049460.423554
90.5788330.005549104.3120.0000.5679570.589709
101
Gen.
Lorenz
1
76.4882.17635.1470.00072.22380.754
2224.8374.42750.7820.000216.159233.514
3430.0666.96861.7230.000416.41443.722
4693.56910.47566.210.000673.038714.1
51034.00615.09668.4940.0001004.4171063.594
61469.121.20869.2720.0001427.5331510.666
72039.0729.08970.0990.0001982.0572096.082
82788.01139.31970.9080.0002710.9482865.074
93895.69755.96169.6150.0003786.0164005.378
106730.26498.32868.4470.0006537.5456922.984
Gini0.5407810.004607117.38300.5317520.549811
  1. (Number of obs = 12251, Population size = 15473935.69, Design df = 12250).

Table A11
Quantile group shares, cumulative shares (Lorenz ordinates), generalized Lorenz ordinates, and Gini (Reform 4).
Group shareEstimateLinearized
Std.Err
zP>|z|[95% Conf.Interval]
10.0115770.0003434.060.0000.0109110.012243
20.022280.00042152.8740.0000.0214540.023106
30.0306420.00049761.5930.0000.0296670.031617
40.0394810.00063462.250.0000.0382380.040724
50.050740.00076566.2850.0000.049240.052241
60.0646580.00094568.4010.0000.0628060.066511
70.0842480.00114473.6740.0000.0820060.086489
80.1111960.0014377.7710.0000.1083940.113998
90.1641580.00217875.3750.0000.1598890.168426
100.421020.00553576.070.0000.4101720.431867
Cumul.
share
10.0115770.0003434.060.0000.0109110.012243
20.0338570.00070448.0920.0000.0324770.035237
30.0644990.00113157.0420.0000.0622830.066715
40.103980.00166162.6070.0000.1007250.107235
50.154720.00229567.4090.0000.1502220.159219
60.2193790.00303572.290.0000.2134310.225327
70.3036260.00388278.2170.0000.2960180.311234
80.4148220.00474187.4920.0000.405530.424115
90.578980.005535104.6110.0000.5681330.589828
101
Gen.
Lorenz
177.932.22535.0230.00073.56982.291
2227.9034.43651.380.000219.21236.597
3434.1656.96362.3550.000420.519447.812
4699.92310.51366.5780.000679.318720.528
51041.47215.08469.0460.0001011.9091071.036
61476.70921.17469.7410.0001435.2091518.21
72043.80828.89470.7350.0001987.1762100.439
82792.30539.12471.3710.0002715.6242868.987
93897.30655.8269.8190.0003787.94006.711
106731.32898.21468.5370.0006538.8326923.825
Gini0.5395640.004607117.11200.5305340.548594
  1. (Number of obs = 10338, Population size = 13156031.80, Design df = 10337)

Data and code availability

The data and code in relation to the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author Evaristo Mwale.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)