1. Environment
Download icon

A microsimulation model for risk in Irish tillage farming

  1. Jason Loughrey  Is a corresponding author
  2. Fiona Thorne  Is a corresponding author
  3. Thia Hennessy  Is a corresponding author
  1. Rural Economy and Development Programme, Ireland
Research article
Volume 9(2) Summer 2016
Cite this article as: J. Loughrey, F. Thorne, T. Hennessy; 2016; A microsimulation model for risk in Irish tillage farming; International Journal of Microsimulation; 9(2); 41-76. doi: 10.34196/ijm.00135
6 figures and 7 tables

Figures

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
Historical price trends for selected grain crops (€).
Figure 2
Download asset Open asset
Cost indices for key inputs at sowing time (Index 2000)1.
Figure 3
Download asset Open asset
Actual and linear predicted spring barley price (€) 1995–2013.
Figure 4
Download asset Open asset
Cumulative distribution function of the feed barley price in 2014.
Figure 5
Download asset Open asset
Cumulative distribution of the variability in barley yield in 2014.
Figure 6
Download asset Open asset
Cumulative distribution of the variability in market gross revenue.

Tables

Table 1
Statistics for the selected sample and other tillage producers.
Other Tillage Producers The selected sample
No Spring Barley Less than Five Years of Spring Barley Five Years Plus of Spring Barley
Spring Barley Yield [Animal Feed] N/A 5.69 6.04
Average Spring Barley [Animal Feed] Hectares 0.00 6.54 10.45
Average Malted Spring Barley Hectares 5.69 1.37 0.34
Farm Size [Number of Hectares 59.23 54.03 69.71
Land Owned 51.97 44.44 59.25
Land Rented In 11.02 14.45 15.01
Total Pasture Hectares 30.43 30.63 38.50
Total Tillage Hectares 24.28 20.36 27.97
Number of Crops in Each Year 1.11 1.38 1.59
Mainly Tillage (0,1) 0.37 0.47 0.51
Specialist Dairy (0,1) 0.20 0.13 0.06
Livestock Units 59.48 56.80 69.73
Livestock Units Per Hectare 1.07 1.01 0.97
Farm Operator Age 50.99 51.90 55.98
Mean Farm Income 38,353 31,140 36,750
Mean Market Farm Income 19,790 15,446 11,780
Mean Single Farm Payment 17,482 14,722 23,991
Off-Farm Employment Operator 0.34 0.38 0.24
Off-Farm Employment Spouse 0.23 0.31 0.28
Sample size 49 240 138

  1. Source: Authors Calculations using Teagasc National Farm Survey Data 2005–2013.

Table 2
Parameters for an empirical distribution of feed barley price in 2014.
Historical Ranking Deterministic Component P⌢ct Sorted Fractional Deviates Dct Cumulative Probability (F(Dc)
Min 156.736 −0.364135974 0
1 156.736 −0.346796166 0.0263
2 156.736 −0.200781935 0.0789
3 156.736 −0.19998511 0.1316
4 156.736 −0.19211783 0.1842
5 156.736 −0.12981906 0.2368
6 156.736 −0.12203359 0.2895
7 156.736 −0.10178267 0.3421
8 156.736 −0.08118956 0.3947
9 156.736 −0.03725432 0.4474
10 156.736 −0.01925512 0.5
11 156.736 −0.00869402 0.5526
12 156.736 −0.00817022 0.6053
13 156.736 −0.002380722 0.6579
14 156.736 0.038333195 0.7105
15 156.736 0.086928907 0.7632
16 156.736 0.219717674 0.8158
17 156.736 0.34089299 0.8684
18 156.736 0.405517738 0.9211
19 156.736 0.424213082 0.9737
Max 156.736 0.445423736 1
Table 3A
The variability of market gross margin across the distribution.
Coefficient of Variation Standard Deviation
25th Percentile Median 75th Percentile 25th Percentile Median 75th Percentile
Market Gross Revenue 23.31 25.25 27.76 1780.08 3420.50 6524.20
Market Gross Margin 54.96 69.77 119.43 1811.45 3531.71 6556.58
Table 3B
Effect of forward contracting on variability of market gross margin.
Coefficient of Variation (%) Standard Deviation
25th Percentile Median 75th Percentile 25th Percentile Median 75th Percentile
Market Gross Margin 54.96 69.77 119.43 1811.45 3531.71 6556.58
Margin with Forward Selling Option A 48.04 62.32 112.57 1639.82 3195.35 5474.91
Margin with Forward Selling Option B 42.11 57.20 97.93 1433.87 2812.42 4703.06

  1. A-20% of expected production @ 150 euro per tonne B-35% of expected production @ 150 euro per tonne.

Table 4
Average coefficient of variation by farm system 2005–20137.
Farm system Total Farm Gross Margin (%) Total Farm Gross Margin (Excluding Subsidies) (%)
Cattle 28.75 57.29
Specialist Dairy 22.70 29.89
Specialist Tillage 23.86 42.38
Sheep 22.16 64.92
Dairy and Other 25.85 50.00
Total 26.23 52.20
Non-Specialist Tillage8 21.49 39.16
No. of observations 927 927

  1. Source: Authors calculations using Teagasc National Farm Survey data.

Table 5
Correlation coefficient between livestock and crop returns.
Percentile Correlation Coefficient
10th Percentile −0.46
25th Percentile −0.16
50th Percentile (Median) 0.13
75th Percentile 0.39
90th Percentile 0.61

  1. Source: Authors calculations using Teagasc National Farm Survey data.

Table 6
Intra-temporal correlation matrix.
Yields Prices
IR UK USA IR
Malt Feed Mill Feed Mill Feed
Oats Barley Wheat Barley Oats Rye Wheat Soybean Barley Wheat Oats
IR Oats Yield 1 0.72 0.69 0.23 0.03 −0.09 0.22 −0.20 0.18 −0.03 −0.03 −0.02 −0.04 −0.12
IR Barley Yield 1 0.84 0.24 −0.02 −0.07 0.27 −0.05 0.20 0.10 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.09
IR Wheat Yield 1 0.24 0.33 −0.16 0.51 −0.04 0.05 −0.10 −0.20 −0.08 −0.13 −0.11
UK Barley Yield 1 0.54 0.60 0.65 0.00 −0.11 −0.09 −0.09 −0.14 −0.04 −0.08
UK Oats Yield 1 0.23 0.69 −0.09 −0.22 −0.19 −0.27 −0.19 −0.19 −0.17
UK Rye Yield 1 0.51 0.29 −0.40 −0.35 −0.24 −0.44 −0.30 −0.33
UK Wheat Yield 1 −0.21 −0.17 −0.23 −0.23 −0.34 −0.20 −0.25
USA Soybean Yield 1 −0.59 −0.46 −0.47 −0.37 −0.47 −0.32
Price IR Malt Barley 1 0.85 0.83 0.81 0.86 0.78
Price IR Feed Barley 1 0.95 0.97 0.99 0.97
Price IR Mill Wheat 1 0.91 0.94 0.88
Price IR Feed Wheat 1 0.96 0.97
Price IR Mill Oats 1 0.96
Price IR Feed Oats 1

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)