
Combining Microsimulation and Numerical Maximization to Identify Optimal Tax-Transfer Rules
Cite this article
as: U. Colombino, N. Islam; 2022; Combining Microsimulation and Numerical Maximization to Identify Optimal Tax-Transfer Rules; International Journal of Microsimulation; 15(2); 4-43.
doi: 10.34196/ijm.00261
Figures
Tables
Table 1
“Current” and optimal TTRs
Current* | k = .00 | k = .05 | k= .075 | k = .10 | k =.125 | k = .15 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
France | τ0 | 603.27 | 61.43 | 181.72 | 265.57 | 367.97 | 453.77 | 592.02 |
τ1 | 0.52 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.70 | |
τ2 | 3.01×10-6 | -0.0000×10-6 | 0.0106×10-6 | 0.013×10-6 | 0.011×10-6 | 0.0098×10-6 | 0.0097×10-6 | |
τ3 | -1.51×10-11 | 0.0004×10-11 | 0.0062×10-11 | 0.015×10-11 | 0.005×10-11 | 0.0064×10-11 | 0.0053×10-11 | |
τ4 | 0.20×10-16 | 0.0009×10-16 | 0.008×10-16 | 0.014×10-16 | 0.017×10-16 | 0.0098×10-16 | 0.0051×10-16 | |
Germany | τ0 | 427.9 | 427.9 | 454.23 | 554.48 | 600.91 | 600.9075 | 701.7375 |
τ1 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.61 | |
τ2 | 0.0016×10-6 | 0.003×10-6 | 0.001×10-6 | 0.0001×10-6 | 0.001×10-6 | 0.002×10-6 | 0.002×10-6 | |
τ3 | 0.0009×10-11 | 0.005×10-11 | -0.002×10-11 | 0.001×10-11 | 0.001×10-11 | 0.001×10-11 | 0.001×10-11 | |
τ4 | 0.0022×10-16 | 0.010×10-16 | 0.004×10-16 | 0.001×10-16 | 0.001×10-16 | 0.004×10-16 | 0.002×10-16 | |
Italy | τ0 | 217.24 | 98.99 | 177.28 | 236.69 | 270.67 | 350.15 | 417.72 |
τ1 | 0.745 | 0.752 | 0.698 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.53 | |
τ2 | -1.98×10-6 | -0.02×10-6 | -0.01×10-6 | 0.002×10-6 | 0.005×10-6 | 0.0002×10-6 | 0.0008×10-6 | |
τ3 | 0.69×10-11 | 0.04×10-11 | 0.01×10-11 | 0.004×10-11 | 0.004×10-11 | 0.0000×10-11 | -0.0004×10-11 | |
τ4 | -0.07×10-16 | -0.02×10-16 | -0.01×10-16 | -0.0000×10-16 | 0.003×10-16 | 0.0005×10-16 | 0.0025×10-16 | |
Luxembourg | τ0 | 1469.68 | 615.73 | 680.78 | 746.64 | 809.23 | 858.74 | 926.17 |
τ1 | 0.316 | 0.761 | 0.75 | 0.717 | 0.706 | 0.692 | 0.676 | |
τ2 | 4.12×10-6 | 0.228×10-6 | 0.24×10-6 | 0.23×10-6 | 0.245×10-6 | 0.227×10-6 | 0.223×10-6 | |
τ3 | -1.869×10-11 | 0.019×10-11 | 0.022×10-11 | 0.014×10-11 | 0.051×10-11 | 0.041×10-11 | 0.013×10-11 | |
τ4 | 0.25×10-16 | 0.07×10-16 | 0.017×10-16 | 0.075×10-16 | 0.008×10-16 | 0.009×10-16 | -0.004×10-16 | |
Spain | τ0 | 196.42 | 227.43 | 225.51 | 436.88 | 481.18 | 493.54 | 498.23 |
τ1 | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.60 | |
τ2 | -4.24×10-6 | 0.001×10-6 | 0.0005×10-6 | -0.0012×10-6 | 0.001×10-6 | 0.0005×10-6 | -0.0001×10-6 | |
τ3 | 2.05×10-11 | 0.001×10-11 | .0008×10-11 | -.0008×10-11 | 0.0003×10-11 | -.0001×10-11 | 0.0000×10-11 | |
τ4 | -0.36×10-16 | 0.001×10-16 | 0.0008×10-16 | -0.003×10-16 | 0.001×10-16 | 0.0002×10-16 | 0.0000×10-16 | |
United Kingdom | τ0 | 455.51 | 289.08 | 564.61 | 564.82 | 628.61 | 749.57 | 864.62 |
τ1 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.40 | |
τ2 | 1.717×10-6 | -0.0002×10-6 | 0.0003×10-6 | 0.0003×10-6 | 0.001×10-6 | -0.005×10-6 | -0.001×10-6 | |
τ3 | -2.008×10-11 | 0.0002×10-11 | 0.0001×10-11 | 0.001×10-11 | -0.0006×10-11 | 0.002×10-11 | -0.002×10-11 | |
τ4 | 0.505×10-16 | 0.0001×10-16 | 0.0001×10-16 | 0.0004×10-16 | -0.0004×10-16 | -0.003×10-16 | -0.001×10-16 |
-
*
In the “Current” column, the parameter τ are those of the polynomial approximation to the current TTR.
Table 2
Welfare Gains and Welfare Winners
k = .00 | k = .05 | k= .075 | k = .10 | k =.125 | k = .15 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
France | Social Welfare Gain | 159.23 | 89.63 | 53.17 | 16.37 | -8.6 | -45.47 |
Equality Gain | 0 | -20.31 | -20.64 | -12.4 | -1.86 | 20.3 | |
Efficiency Gain | 159.23 | 109.94 | 73.81 | 28.77 | -6.64 | -65.77 | |
%Winners: All | 67 | 67 | 66 | 65 | 64 | 61 | |
%Winners: Couples | 66 | 66 | 65 | 64 | 62 | 57 | |
%Winners: Single Males | 84 | 80 | 76 | 71 | 66 | 62 | |
%Winners: Single Females | 51 | 55 | 57 | 61 | 66 | 72 | |
Germany | Social Welfare Gain | -7.48 | -5.00 | 41.05 | 71.39 | 87.65 | 155.27 |
Equality Gain | 0 | -2.02 | 8.51 | 23.68 | 39.94 | 78.61 | |
Efficiency Gain | -7.48 | -2.98 | 32.54 | 47.71 | 47.71 | 76.66 | |
%Winners: All | 46 | 44 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 49 | |
%Winners: Couples | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | |
%Winners: Single M | 37 | 38 | 38 | 40 | 40 | 41 | |
%Winners: Single F | 55 | 56 | 62 | 63 | 63 | 71 | |
Italy | Social Welfare Gain | 72.9 | 45.93 | 28.4 | 18.64 | -1.35 | -18.54 |
Equality Gain | 0 | -3 | -3.06 | -2.97 | 0.13 | 3.16 | |
Efficiency Gain | 72.9 | 48.93 | 31.46 | 21.61 | -1.48 | -21.70 | |
%Winners | 56 | 58 | 58 | 57 | 53 | 52 | |
%Winners: Couples | 51 | 49 | 44 | 42 | 38 | 36 | |
%Winners: Single M | 59 | 66 | 69 | 70 | 63 | 61 | |
%Winners: Single F | 58 | 63 | 65 | 65 | 64 | 63 | |
Luxembourg | Social Welfare Gain | 2.06 | -35.63 | -68.35 | -62.63 | -67.54 | -66.94 |
Equality Gain | 0 | -41.82 | -43.04 | -46.45 | -40.26 | -27.94 | |
Efficiency Gain | 2.06 | 6.19 | -25.31 | -16.18 | -27.28 | -39.00 | |
%Winners | 45 | 48 | 46 | 48 | 49 | 51 | |
%Winners: Couples | 54 | 59 | 54 | 58 | 59 | 61 | |
%Winners: Single M | 31 | 32 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners: Single F | 44 | 47 | 48 | 50 | 52 | 56 | |
Spain | Social Welfare Gain | -16.99 | -13.87 | 10.65 | 13.83 | 21.35 | 27.17 |
Equality Gain | 0 | 2.17 | 13.88 | 20.25 | 25.47 | 30.29 | |
Efficiency Gain | -16.99 | -16.04 | -3.23 | -6.42 | -4.12 | -3.12 | |
%Winners | 73 | 73 | 67 | 63 | 63 | 63 | |
%Winners: Couples | 75 | 75 | 63 | 56 | 56 | 55 | |
%Winners: Single M | 70 | 70 | 72 | 70 | 70 | 70 | |
%Winners: Single F | 70 | 70 | 73 | 73 | 74 | 74 | |
United Kingdom | Social Welfare Gain | -18.37 | 37.42 | 37.81 | 48.34 | 65.19 | 77.19 |
Equality Gain | 0 | 0.81 | 1.14 | 1.24 | 0.64 | -0.17 | |
Efficiency Gain | -18.37 | 36.61 | 36.67 | 47.10 | 64.55 | 77.36 | |
%Winners: All | 42 | 76 | 77 | 79 | 81 | 82 | |
%Winners: Couples | 23 | 79 | 82 | 84 | 88 | 90 | |
%Winners: Single M | 57 | 64 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 68 | |
%Winners: Single F | 64 | 82 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 82 |
Table 3
“Primitives” of the economy and characteristics of the optimal polynomial TTRs
UBI | Leading Tax Rate | |
---|---|---|
Constant | 357.28 2.14 | -5.04 -0.3 |
Kolm’s k | 25.44 14.01 | 1.40 9.95 |
Productivity | 0.22 11.29 | 0.002 1.48 |
Extensive Elasticity | 117.35 3.05 | 9.90 3.31 |
Intensive Elasticity | 253.55 8.44 | 1.46 0.62 |
Budget | -0.25 -8.08 | 0.002 -0.85 |
R2 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
Standard error of the estimate | 53.69 | 0.04 |
-
t-values in italics below the estimates.
-
Bold estimates are significant at standard levels.
Table A1
Maximum likelihood estimates – couples (France)
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. |
---|---|---|---|
Opportunity density | δ | ||
Employee_Man | 0.4761696 | 0.3665576 | |
Self-employed_Man | 0.2130577 | 0.3805561 | |
Employee_Woman | -0.3649212 | 0.2853927 | |
Self-employed_Woman | -1.426779 | 0.3241603 | |
Part-time_Employee_Man | -0.3805255 | 0.2414433 | |
Full-time_Employee_Man | 2.83453 | 0.1249029 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Man | -1.841048 | 0.324269 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Man | 0.2870089 | 0.1540075 | |
Part-time_Employee_Woman | 0.6361778 | 0.2170085 | |
Full-time_Employee_Woman | 2.698627 | 0.1676399 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Woman | -1.014395 | 0.3149686 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Woman | 0.6781008 | 0.2277644 | |
Income | γ | ||
Household_Disposable_income | 0.0003342 | 0.0001334 | |
Hosuhold_Disposable_income squared | 1.61E-08 | 6.75E-09 | |
Household_size X Household_disposable_income | -0.0000513 | 0.0000175 | |
Leisure | λ | ||
Leisure_Male | 0.1256514 | 0.0281893 | |
Leisure_Man squared | 0.0000173 | 0.0001373 | |
Leisure_Woman | 0.163189 | 0.0255661 | |
Leisure_Woman squared | -0.000107 | 0.0001529 | |
Leisure_Man X Household_disp_income | -7.88E-06 | 1.02E-06 | |
Leisure_Woman X Household_disp_income | -1.54E-07 | 8.04E-07 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man | -0.0059183 | 0.0011829 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman | -0.0085386 | 0.0009848 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man squared | 0.0000742 | 0.0000138 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman squared | 0.0001108 | 0.000012 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children | -0.0026133 | 0.0017907 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children | 0.0084813 | 0.0015617 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children0-6 | 0.0027957 | 0.0025747 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children7-10 | 0.006507 | 0.0027523 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children0-6 | 0.006981 | 0.0021144 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children7-10 | 0.0007436 | 0.002288 | |
Leisure_Woman X Leisure_Man | 0.0001134 | 0.0000948 | |
N.observations (N. couples*49 alternatives) | 195804 | ||
N.couples | 3996 | ||
LR chi2(32) | 15140.15 | ||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | ||
Pseudo R2 | 0.4868 | ||
Log likelihood | -7981.6412 |
Table A2
Maximum likelihood estimates – singles (France)
Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. | Coef. | Std. Err. |
Opportunity density | δ | δ | |||
Employee | 0.199478 | 0.533068 | -1.19744 | 0.470041 | |
Self_employed | -0.21333 | 0.593638 | -1.68397 | 0.553979 | |
Part-time_Employee | -0.69588 | 0.393698 | 1.256628 | 0.352174 | |
Full-time_Employee | 2.213382 | 0.253926 | 2.994315 | 0.267448 | |
Part-time_Self-employed | -2.70132 | 0.585303 | -1.80785 | 0.627849 | |
Full-time_Self-employed | -0.28412 | 0.336337 | 0.368914 | 0.377033 | |
Income | λ | λ | |||
Disposable income | -0.00012 | 0.00024 | 7.55E-05 | 0.000379 | |
Disposable income squared | 4.53E-08 | 2.07E-08 | 6.64E-08 | 4.13E-08 | |
Household size X Disp_income | -5.6E-05 | 4.62E-05 | -6.7E-05 | 6.84E-05 | |
Leisure | λ | λ | |||
Leisure | 0.129227 | 0.029882 | 0.15447 | 0.034747 | |
Leisure2 | -8.1E-05 | 0.000239 | -9.2E-05 | 0.000254 | |
Leisure X Disposable income | 1.01E-06 | 2.34E-06 | 6.43E-07 | 3.40E-06 | |
Leisure X Age | -0.00516 | 0.000963 | -0.0075 | 0.001086 | |
Leisure X Age squared | 6.36E-05 | 1.21E-05 | 0.000092 | 1.34E-05 | |
Leisure X No. Children | -0.01374 | 0.005121 | 0.006768 | 0.003433 | |
Leisure X No. Children 0-6 | -0.00814 | 0.019875 | 0.015925 | 0.00544 | |
Leisure X No. Children 7-10 | 0.011728 | 0.010413 | 0.008727 | 0.004892 | |
Other | |||||
N.observations (N. single*7 alternatives) | 9331 | 10465 | |||
N.single | 1333 | 1495 | |||
LR chi2(17) | 2318.15 | 2657.35 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | 0 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.4468 | 0.4567 | |||
Log likelihood | -1434.83 | -1580.46 |
Table A3
Maximum likelihood estimates – couples (Germany)
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. |
---|---|---|---|
Opportunity density | δ | ||
Employee_Man | -0.5269339 | 0.435726 | |
Self-employed_Man | -1.611115 | 0.4373339 | |
Employee_Woman | -1.560942 | 0.2543809 | |
Self-employed_Woman | -3.580387 | 0.3637122 | |
Part-time_Employee_Man | -0.9591195 | 0.2591677 | |
Full-time_Employee_Man | 2.516702 | 0.1205793 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Man | -1.797576 | 0.3673868 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Man | 0.940684 | 0.1597094 | |
Part-time_Employee_Woman | 1.829915 | 0.2318468 | |
Full-time_Employee_Woman | 2.531309 | 0.1913391 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Woman | 0.8422771 | 0.341443 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Woman | 1.067966 | 0.2761494 | |
Income | γ | ||
Household_Disposable_income | 0.001699 | 0.0001136 | |
Hosuhold_Disposable_income squared | -5.60E-08 | 5.58E-09 | |
Household_size X Household_disposable_income | 0.0000479 | 0.0000222 | |
Leisure | λ | ||
Leisure_Male | 0.184064 | 0.0264439 | |
Leisure_Man squared | -0.0004684 | 0.0002088 | |
Leisure_Woman | 0.2376265 | 0.0251642 | |
Leisure_Woman squared | -0.0011735 | 0.00014 | |
Leisure_Man X Household_disp_income | -1.38E-05 | 7.25E-07 | |
Leisure_Woman X Household_disp_income | -9.65E-06 | 5.79E-07 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man | -0.0030924 | 0.0009326 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman | -0.0046903 | 0.0009542 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man squared | 0.0000357 | 0.0000106 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman squared | 0.0000713 | 0.0000112 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children | -0.0017621 | 0.0019208 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children | 0.0231159 | 0.0016417 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children0-6 | 0.0184762 | 0.0025177 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children7-10 | -0.0007047 | 0.0032015 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children0-6 | 0.01427 | 0.0025455 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children7-10 | 0.0037864 | 0.0026824 | |
Leisure_Woman X Leisure_Man | -0.0003689 | 0.0000744 | |
Other | |||
N.observations (N. couples*49 alternatives) | 201,243 | ||
N.couples | 4107 | ||
LR chi2(32) | 14394.76 | ||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | ||
Pseudo R2 | 0.4503 | ||
Log likelihood | -8786.3249 |
Table A4
Maximum likelihood estimates – singles (Germany)
Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. | Coef. | Std. Err. |
Opportunity density | δ | δ | |||
Employee | -0.80193 | 0.57248 | -1.43637 | 0.446197 | |
Self_employed | 0.179376 | 0.597029 | -8.15099 | 0.661612 | |
Part-time_Employee | -0.32109 | 0.406771 | 0.579569 | 0.34354 | |
Full-time_Employee | 2.865958 | 0.240845 | 2.703306 | 0.249755 | |
Part-time_Self-employed | -2.54205 | 0.498362 | 4.688473 | 0.595456 | |
Full-time_Self-employed | 0.184833 | 0.295293 | 4.011293 | 0.42799 | |
Income | γ | γ | |||
Disposable income | 0.003328 | 0.000448 | 0.003246 | 0.000196 | |
Disposable income squared | -7.89E-07 | 7.78E-08 | -1.49E-07 | 1.28E-08 | |
Household size X Disp_income | 6.42E-04 | 1.93E-04 | 8.93E-05 | 3.80E-05 | |
Leisure | λ | λ | |||
Leisure | 0.241596 | 0.03538 | 0.281701 | 0.033209 | |
Leisure2 | -0.00076 | 0.000296 | -0.00141 | 0.000258 | |
Leisure X Disposable income | -4.42E-05 | 2.40E-06 | -3.86E-05 | 2.08E-06 | |
Leisure X Age | -0.00382 | 0.001035 | -0.00337 | 0.001006 | |
Leisure X Age squared | 5.09E-05 | 1.24E-05 | 4.29E-05 | 1.20E-05 | |
Leisure X No. Children | -0.02709 | 0.012505 | 0.014031 | 0.003459 | |
Leisure X No. Children 0-6 | 0.038387 | 0.020631 | 0.0287 | 0.007638 | |
Leisure X No. Children 7-10 | 0.016741 | 0.021338 | 0.017555 | 0.006452 | |
Other | |||||
N.observations (N. single*7 alternatives) | 10,283 | 12,551 | |||
N.single | 1469 | 1793 | |||
LR chi2(17) | 2983.13 | 3608.3 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | 0 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.5218 | 0.5171 | |||
Log likelihood | -1366.98 | -1684.87 |
Table A5
Maximum likelihood estimates – couples (Italy)
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. |
---|---|---|---|
Opportunity density | δ | ||
Employee_Man | -2.227042 | 0.3359151 | |
Self-employed_Man | -1.793772 | 0.3327547 | |
Employee_Woman | -4.205803 | 0.3711781 | |
Self-employed_Woman | -3.159583 | 0.3091701 | |
Part-time_Employee_Man | 1.810835 | 0.2235256 | |
Full-time_Employee_Man | 3.457804 | 0.1466732 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Man | -1.142189 | 0.2861769 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Man | 1.827801 | 0.1352579 | |
Part-time_Employee_Woman | 3.522802 | 0.3488772 | |
Full-time_Employee_Woman | 4.233018 | 0.3257372 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Woman | 0.2200945 | 0.3028192 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Woman | 1.989132 | 0.2580389 | |
Income | γ | ||
Household_Disposable_income | 0.0005129 | 0.0001534 | |
Hosuhold_Disposable_income squared | 1.36E-08 | 7.25E-09 | |
Household_size X Household_disposable_income | -0.0001608 | 0.0000251 | |
Leisure | λ | ||
Leisure_Male | 0.0030689 | 0.05153 | |
Leisure_Man squared | -0.0000926 | 0.0001607 | |
Leisure_Woman | 0.2598116 | 0.0365898 | |
Leisure_Woman squared | -0.000653 | 0.0001763 | |
Leisure_Man X Household_disp_income | 4.38E-06 | 1.43E-06 | |
Leisure_Woman X Household_disp_income | -5.81E-07 | 1.01E-06 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man | -0.0015349 | 0.0025113 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman | -0.0097254 | 0.0016741 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man squared | 0.0000135 | 0.0000318 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman squared | 0.0001141 | 0.0000223 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children | -0.0081218 | 0.0022336 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children | 0.0078869 | 0.0017578 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children0-6 | 0.0076125 | 0.0026554 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children7-10 | 0.0002707 | 0.0028172 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children0-6 | -0.0054445 | 0.0020634 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children7-10 | -0.0009139 | 0.0020886 | |
Leisure_Woman X Leisure_Man | 0.0003854 | 0.0000964 | |
Other | |||
N.observations (N. couples*49 alternatives) | 188405 | ||
N.couples | 3845 | ||
LR chi2(32) | 10209.91 | ||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | ||
Pseudo R2 | 0.3411 | ||
Log likelihood | -9859.09 |
Table A6
Maximum likelihood estimates – singles (Italy)
Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. | Coef. | Std. Err. |
Opportunity density | δ | δ | |||
Employee | -1.22117 | 0.331639 | -3.43019 | 0.3787 | |
Self_employed | -0.47643 | 0.315555 | -2.81075 | 0.350903 | |
Part-time_Employee | 1.263827 | 0.268794 | 3.554593 | 0.34008 | |
Full-time_Employee | 3.310487 | 0.207522 | 4.654217 | 0.303264 | |
Part-time_Self-employed | -2.2652 | 0.32631 | 0.618142 | 0.341357 | |
Full-time_Self-employed | 1.473456 | 0.180946 | 2.786139 | 0.266647 | |
Income | γ | γ | |||
Disposable income | 0.000114 | 0.000145 | 0.0003 | 0.000255 | |
Disposable income squared | 5.12E-09 | 1.08E-08 | 6.55E-09 | 3.11E-08 | |
Household size X Disp_income | -5.5E-05 | 4.01E-05 | -0.00011 | 4.77E-05 | |
Leisure | λ | λ | |||
Leisure | 0.280595 | 0.024332 | 0.312801 | 0.030346 | |
Leisure2 | 0.000164 | 0.000173 | 0.000428 | 0.000198 | |
Leisure X Disposable income | 1.36E-06 | 1.55E-06 | -1.91E-07 | 2.59E-06 | |
Leisure X Age | -0.01438 | 0.001037 | -0.01841 | 0.001297 | |
Leisure X Age squared | 0.000176 | 1.51E-05 | 0.000225 | 1.84E-05 | |
Leisure X No. Children | -0.0191 | 0.01175 | 0.005966 | 0.003381 | |
Leisure X No. Children 0-6 | 0.007813 | 0.020605 | 0.00305 | 0.005703 | |
Leisure X No. Children 7-10 | 0.011513 | 0.022161 | -0.00433 | 0.005772 | |
Other | |||||
N.observations (N. single*7 alternatives) | 22190 | 18270 | |||
N.single | 3170 | 2610 | |||
LR chi2(17) | 4055.02 | 3501.41 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | 0 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.3287 | 0.3447 | |||
Log likelihood | -4141.03 | -3328.12 |
Table A7
Maximum likelihood estimates – couples (Luxembourg)
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. |
---|---|---|---|
Opportunity density | δ | ||
Employee_Man | 2.798179 | 1.230943 | |
Self-employed_Man | 1.196799 | 1.218041 | |
Employee_Woman | -1.670879 | 0.4877308 | |
Self-employed_Woman | -3.273727 | 0.5811094 | |
Part-time_Employee_Man | -0.9321119 | 0.5778732 | |
Full-time_Employee_Man | 2.740097 | 0.2477136 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Man | -3.276221 | 1.176261 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Man | 0.3923308 | 0.4062014 | |
Part-time_Employee_Woman | 2.251194 | 0.381928 | |
Full-time_Employee_Woman | 3.024338 | 0.2864887 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Woman | -0.0916981 | 0.6417357 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Woman | 0.9017009 | 0.4806236 | |
Income | γ | ||
Household_Disposable_income | 0.0001153 | 0.0001343 | |
Hosuhold_Disposable_income squared | -2.43E-09 | 2.07E-09 | |
Household_size×Household_disposable_income | -1.63E-06 | 0.000023 | |
Leisure | λ | ||
Leisure_Male | -0.0472945 | 0.0551945 | |
Leisure_Man squared | 0.0014071 | 0.0004473 | |
Leisure_Woman | 0.0416601 | 0.0425495 | |
Leisure_Woman squared | 0.0003121 | 0.0002634 | |
Leisure_Man X Household_disp_income | 1.64E-06 | 8.45E-07 | |
Leisure_Woman X Household_disp_income | 1.18E-07 | 8.47E-07 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man | -0.0038039 | 0.0021464 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman | -0.0059885 | 0.0016256 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man squared | 0.0000479 | 0.0000254 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman squared | 0.0000904 | 0.0000201 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children | -0.0067684 | 0.0038964 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children | 0.0069002 | 0.0027455 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children0-6 | 0.0085339 | 0.0051382 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children7-10 | 0.002834 | 0.0060786 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children0-6 | 0.0088988 | 0.0034797 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children7-10 | 0.0022974 | 0.0039516 | |
Leisure_Woman X Leisure_Man | 0.0002931 | 0.0001535 | |
Other | |||
N.observations (N. couples*49 alternatives) | 64435 | ||
N.couples | 1315 | ||
LR chi2(32) | 5058.95 | ||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | ||
Pseudo R2 | 0.4943 | ||
Log likelihood | -2588.2705 |
Table A8
Maximum likelihood estimates – singles (Luxembourg)
Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. | Coef. | Std. Err. |
Opportunity density | δ | δ | |||
Employee | 3.840025 | 1.467676 | -3.83547 | 0.916069 | |
Self_employed | 3.076828 | 1.44261 | -6.09075 | 1.124339 | |
Part-time_Employee | -1.25405 | 0.727917 | 3.214104 | 0.688409 | |
Full-time_Employee | 2.760224 | 0.389481 | 3.833989 | 0.508304 | |
Part-time_Self-employed | -17.2776 | 699.2763 | 2.533271 | 1.111393 | |
Full-time_Self-employed | 0.139062 | 0.585945 | 2.068577 | 0.878229 | |
Income | γ | γ | |||
Disposable income | 3.53E-05 | 0.000416 | 0.00036 | 0.000262 | |
Disposable income squared | -8.96E-09 | 2.75E-08 | -8.71E-09 | 9.30E-09 | |
Household size X Disp_income | 0.000177 | 0.000082 | -4.1E-05 | 5.76E-05 | |
Leisure | λ | λ | |||
Leisure | 0.083226 | 0.061447 | 0.222152 | 0.066109 | |
Leisure2 | 0.00187 | 0.000632 | -0.00012 | 0.000504 | |
Leisure X Disposable income | 2.07E-07 | 3.91E-06 | 3.42E-06 | 2.72E-06 | |
Leisure X Age | -0.0096 | 0.001664 | -0.01311 | 0.00192 | |
Leisure X Age squared | 0.000118 | 0.000021 | 0.00016 | 2.33E-05 | |
Leisure X No. Children | 0.010493 | 0.008464 | 0.002518 | 0.005455 | |
Leisure X No. Children 0-6 | 0.006816 | 0.029223 | 0.00331 | 0.010569 | |
Leisure X No. Children 7-10 | 0.024772 | 0.029139 | -0.0027 | 0.009811 | |
Other | |||||
N.observations (N. single*7 alternatives) | 4123 | 3640 | |||
N.single | 589 | 520 | |||
LR chi2(17) | 1157.65 | 951.82 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | 0 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.505 | 4703 | |||
Log likelihood | -567.317 | 5335.965 |
Table A9
Maximum likelihood estimates – couples (Spain)
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. |
---|---|---|---|
Opportunity density | δ | ||
Employee_Man | -0.2868366 | 0.2843099 | |
Self-employed_Man | -0.7698504 | 0.2931603 | |
Employee_Woman | -2.403139 | 0.252017 | |
Self-employed_Woman | -2.585398 | 0.2813223 | |
Part-time_Employee_Man | -0.1938884 | 0.1981381 | |
Full-time_Employee_Man | 2.390778 | 0.1070763 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Man | -1.089852 | 0.2490981 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Man | 0.9119172 | 0.1280802 | |
Part-time_Employee_Woman | 1.511822 | 0.2167088 | |
Full-time_Employee_Woman | 2.692898 | 0.1672168 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Woman | -0.3884766 | 0.2749832 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Woman | 0.8462308 | 0.2033327 | |
Income | γ | ||
Household_Disposable_income | -0.0001841 | 0.0001271 | |
Hosuhold_Disposable_income squared | 2.51E-08 | 8.12E-09 | |
Household_size×Household_disposable_income | -0.0000236 | 0.0000156 | |
Leisure | λ | ||
Leisure_Male | -0.0294838 | 0.0239608 | |
Leisure_Man squared | 0.0005993 | 0.0001227 | |
Leisure_Woman | 0.0991669 | 0.0229826 | |
Leisure_Woman squared | -0.0003914 | 0.0001435 | |
Leisure_Man X Household_disp_income | 5.62E-06 | 9.76E-07 | |
Leisure_Woman X Household_disp_income | 1.22E-06 | 7.46E-07 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man | -0.0022498 | 0.0009384 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman | -0.0043625 | 0.0007961 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man squared | 0.0000224 | 0.0000103 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman squared | 0.0000589 | 9.11E-06 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children | -0.0015521 | 0.0013717 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children | 0.0036569 | 0.0011625 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children0-6 | 0.0034279 | 0.0019022 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children7-10 | -0.0022426 | 0.0020741 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children0-6 | 0.0013244 | 0.0016922 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children7-10 | 0.0020022 | 0.0017517 | |
Leisure_Woman X Leisure_Man | 0.00032 | 0.0000585 | |
Other | |||
N.observations (N. couples*49 alternatives) | 244755 | ||
N.couples | 4995 | ||
LR chi2(32) | 13049.94 | ||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | ||
Pseudo R2 | 0.3357 | ||
Log likelihood | -12914.672 |
Table A10
Maximum likelihood estimates – singles (Spain)
Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. | Coef. | Std. Err. |
Opportunity density | δ | δ | |||
Employee | -1.30198 | 0.428921 | -1.7268 | 0.428239 | |
Self_employed | -1.41084 | 0.456916 | -1.59374 | 0.505891 | |
Part-time_Employee | 0.607968 | 0.329195 | 1.895538 | 0.346785 | |
Full-time_Employee | 2.496161 | 0.217392 | 3.236458 | 0.246681 | |
Part-time_Self-employed | -1.10093 | 0.419394 | -0.78624 | 0.512791 | |
Full-time_Self-employed | 0.757978 | 0.25528 | 1.336878 | 0.331166 | |
Income | γ | γ | |||
Disposable income | 0.000391 | 0.000202 | 0.000249 | 0.000234 | |
Disposable income squared | -2.86E-08 | 2.19E-08 | -4.02E-09 | 2.89E-08 | |
Household size X Disp_income | 3.35E-05 | 4.41E-05 | 0.000166 | 5.63E-05 | |
Leisure | λ | λ | |||
Leisure | 0.091073 | 0.027093 | 0.060002 | 0.028202 | |
Leisure2 | 7.25E-05 | 0.000216 | 0.000661 | 0.000213 | |
Leisure X Disposable income | 2.92E-08 | 2.03E-06 | 2.06E-06 | 2.36E-06 | |
Leisure X Age | -0.00465 | 0.000802 | -0.00588 | 0.000853 | |
Leisure X Age squared | 5.79E-05 | 9.77E-06 | 6.94E-05 | 1.02E-05 | |
Leisure X No. Children | 0.002815 | 0.0077 | 0.005045 | 0.002922 | |
Leisure X No. Children 0-6 | -0.00077 | 0.015847 | 0.004662 | 0.006085 | |
Leisure X No. Children 7-10 | -0.01601 | 0.021244 | 0.00168 | 0.005529 | |
Other | |||||
N.observations (N. single*7 alternatives) | 12530 | 12194 | |||
N.single | 1790 | 1742 | |||
LR chi2(17) | 2335.29 | 2421.22 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | 0 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.3352 | 0.3571 | |||
Log likelihood | -2315.53 | -2179.16 |
Table A11
Maximum likelihood estimates – couples (UK)
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. |
---|---|---|---|
Opportunity density | δ | ||
Employee_Man | 0.1010326 | 0.3378421 | |
Self-employed_Man | -0.6931103 | 0.3433464 | |
Employee_Woman | -2.125809 | 0.2756313 | |
Self-employed_Woman | -2.693189 | 0.3039796 | |
Part-time_Employee_Man | -1.045434 | 0.2048579 | |
Full-time_Employee_Man | 2.390656 | 0.1114932 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Man | -1.088571 | 0.24735 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Man | 1.330872 | 0.1382285 | |
Part-time_Employee_Woman | 1.85452 | 0.2366666 | |
Full-time_Employee_Woman | 2.886648 | 0.2010856 | |
Part-time_Self-employed_Woman | 0.3428018 | 0.2863139 | |
Full-time_Self-employed_Woman | 0.6378565 | 0.2530663 | |
Income | γ | ||
Household_Disposable_income | 0.0001122 | 0.0002534 | |
Hosuhold_Disposable_income squared | -3.40E-08 | 1.75E-08 | |
Household_size X Household_disposable_income | 0.0000397 | 0.000025 | |
Leisure | λ | ||
Leisure_Male | 0.0426497 | 0.0280003 | |
Leisure_Man squared | 0.0004884 | 0.0001547 | |
Leisure_Woman | 0.1642487 | 0.0289328 | |
Leisure_Woman squared | -0.0006741 | 0.0001594 | |
Leisure_Man X Household_disp_income | 9.12E-07 | 1.76E-06 | |
Leisure_Woman X Household_disp_income | -7.02E-07 | 1.45E-06 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man | -0.006004 | 0.0012687 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman | -0.0071774 | 0.0013197 | |
Leisure_Man X Age_Man squared | 0.0000731 | 0.0000171 | |
Leisure_Woman X Age_Woman squared | 0.0000904 | 0.0000183 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children | 0.0023683 | 0.0016979 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children | 0.0169523 | 0.0016992 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children0-6 | -0.0029332 | 0.0017903 | |
Leisure_Man X No. Children7-10 | 0.0008209 | 0.001984 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children0-6 | 0.0142435 | 0.0019016 | |
Leisure_Woman X No. Children7-10 | 0.0034794 | 0.0020909 | |
Leisure_Woman X Leisure_Man | 0.0006758 | 0.0000828 | |
Other | |||
N.observations (N. couples*49 alternatives) | 220843 | ||
N.couples | 4507 | ||
LR chi2(32) | 12926.1 | ||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | ||
Pseudo R2 | 0.3685 | ||
Log likelihood | -11077.385 |
Table A12
Maximum likelihood estimates – singles (UK)
Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model component | Variable | Coef. | Std. Err. | Coef. | Std. Err. |
Opportunity density | δ | δ | |||
Employee | -0.23213 | 0.467104 | -2.73527 | 0.381373 | |
Self_employed | -0.73375 | 0.479139 | -3.96636 | 0.455567 | |
Part-time_Employee | -0.48835 | 0.315075 | 2.234354 | 0.311484 | |
Full-time_Employee | 2.423602 | 0.215381 | 3.217563 | 0.257497 | |
Part-time_Self-employed | -1.83573 | 0.404768 | 1.149457 | 0.429612 | |
Full-time_Self-employed | 0.850365 | 0.26129 | 1.745809 | 0.371801 | |
Income | γ | γ | |||
Disposable income | -8.1E-05 | 0.000262 | 0.001196 | 0.000448 | |
Disposable income squared | 1.29E-08 | 3.04E-08 | -1.33E-07 | 6.24E-08 | |
Household size X Disp_income | 1.13E-05 | 5.03E-05 | -1.9E-05 | 6.18E-05 | |
Leisure | λ | λ | |||
Leisure | 0.122021 | 0.027423 | 0.248225 | 0.030925 | |
Leisure2 | 0.00039 | 0.000239 | -0.00026 | 0.00022 | |
Leisure X Disposable income | 1.27E-06 | 2.44E-06 | -9.32E-06 | 4.05E-06 | |
Leisure X Age | -0.0075 | 0.001001 | -0.01234 | 0.00121 | |
Leisure X Age squared | 0.000102 | 1.47E-05 | 0.000166 | 1.74E-05 | |
Leisure X No. Children | -0.00517 | 0.005611 | 0.015035 | 0.002616 | |
Leisure X No. Children 0-6 | 0.020995 | 0.012061 | 0.026352 | 0.003583 | |
Leisure X No. Children 7-10 | 0.013849 | 0.010819 | 0.004335 | 0.003571 | |
Other | |||||
N.observations (N. single*7 alternatives) | 13937 | 17549 | |||
N.single | 1991 | 2507 | |||
LR chi2(17) | 2736.7 | 3775.11 | |||
Prob > chi2 | 0 | 0 | |||
Pseudo R2 | 0.3532 | 0.3869 | |||
Log likelihood | -2505.96 | -2990.84 |
Data and code availability
Please contact the authors for information on data and code availability.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.