Labour income | Equivalence between income and expenditures. | 1. Predicted via a regression to adjust the values reported in the survey for potential measurement errors and assigning individual income to household members. 2. Hot deck approach adopted to correct for missing values. 3. Adjusted upwards from 2018 to 2020 using CPI values for the year of the survey. 4. Changes in income computed using mean values from GSS rapid surveys for sales, and self-reported optimistic and pessimistic probabilities of sales changes. It provides us with more realistic assumptions about income changes due to COVID-19. | 1. Inflation adjustment: 32.13% 2. Pessimistic probability of expected change in sales in %: Agri. (21.5) Mining (20.5) Manufacturing (29.3) Other manufacturing (30.0) Construction (29.2) Utility (62.2) Trade (23.6) Restaurant and hotel (44.4) Education (26.3) Entertainment (50.0) Other services (28.9) 3. Optimistic probability of expected change in sales in %: Agri. (33.3) Mining (11.5) Manufacturing (22.7) Other manufacturing (40.0) Construction (37.2) Utility (60.0) Trade (46.3) Restaurant and hotel (33.8) Education (47.8) Entertainment (70.0) Other services (41.6) | 1. Likely to be understated or overstated based on the adjustments made. 2. Some sectors may not have adequate observations to enable hot deck imputation to provide reasonable values for missing observations. |
Water subsidy | Households with reported water bill payments are assumed to obtain their water from Ghana water company. | 1. Updated to current prices prior to the pandemic. 2. Hot deck imputation used for missing values. | Inflation adjustment: 32.13% | Not all households use Ghana water company. Some households miss out on the subsidy. Implications: 1. Fewer rural households compared to urban households will benefit. 2. It does not account for periods households do not receive water. |
Electricity subsidy | Positive estimates of an electricity bill are taken to be users of the national grid. | 1. Updated to current prices prior to the pandemic. 2. Hot deck imputation used for missing observations. | Inflation adjustment: 32.13% | Not all households use electricity from the grid. Implications: 1. Fewer rural households compared to urban households will benefit. 2. It does not account for power rationing actual electricity consumed. |
Loans to creatives | 1. Randomly sampled. 2. Same amount applied to all borrowers. | | Males: 16,280 Females: 411 Overall: 0.054% of total population | 1. Under-reporting likely to underestimate the impact. 2. Does not take into account that loan recipients choose the amount to borrow. |
Health reliefs | 1. We assume that the income values used in the analysis are a true reflection of actual income paid to health workers. 2. Equivalence of income and expenditures. | 1. Income values predicted via regression. 2. Taxes computed based on predicted income values. | Inflation adjustment: 32.13% | Potential understatement or overstatement of benefits, depending on whether aggregated categories of health professionals are excluded from the benefits. |
Prices | 1. Price increases follow the food CPI component. 2. Regional differences are small. | Forecasted via a time series regression. | 1. Optimistic scenario: 1st Quarter: 0.0342 2nd Quarter: -0.0033 3rd Quarter: 0.0004 2. Pessimistic scenario: 1st Quarter: 0.0382 2nd Quarter: -0.0013 3rd Quarter: 0.0016 | 1. Forecasts might not reflect the true time path of prices. 2. Large price changes within the microsimulation model could potentially underestimate the welfare effect. |
Remittances | 1. GLSS values taken as reflective of remittances. 2. Changes at the national level taken to reflect changes at the household level. | Adjusted with mean values from the GSS rapid surveys | 1. Inflation adjustment: 32.13% 2. Optimistic scenario: 1st Quarter: -0.0572 2nd Quarter: -0.0286 3rd Quarter: 0.0000 3. Pessimistic scenario: 1st Quarter: -0.0687 2nd Quarter: -0.0343 3rd Quarter: -0.0500 | Likely to understate remittances at the household level if the true level of remittances is under-reported in the survey. If the rate of reduction is smaller than assumed, then the value of remittances will be overstated. |
GLSS7 dataset | 1. Expenditure shares stayed the same over time. | 1. Updates using CPI. 2. Sample weights adjusted to reflect 2020 population estimates. | 1. Inflation adjustment: 32.13% 2. Population growth: 11.09% | |