1. Dynamic microsimulation
Download icon

A Micro-Macro Interactive Simulation Model of the Swedish Economy

Research article
Cite this article as: G. Eliasson; 2024; A Micro-Macro Interactive Simulation Model of the Swedish Economy; International Journal of Microsimulation; 17(2); 60-128. doi: 10.34196/ijm.00292
12 figures and 3 tables

Figures

Business decision system (one firm).
Production system.
Consumption system and prod-markets.
Long-term plan.
INV-decision.
Trend comparison (MACRO – INDUSTRY), annual (change in percent).
(A) Profit and loss statement. (B) Cash flows. (C) Balance sheet.
Shifting of production possibilities curve because of depreciation and new investments in best practice technologies.
(A) Initial position, (B) new transitory initial position after retirement; (C) new preliminary initial position before labour market search.

Tables

Table 1
Model modules
Business system (manufacturing firm model)
Operations planning (short term)
 Production system
 Inventory system
 Expectations
 Profit targeting
 (Cash management)
Investment-Financing (long term)
 Investment plan
 Long term borrowing
Household consumption (macro)
 Buying/consuming
 Saving
Service sector (macro)
Government sector (macro)
 Employment
 Taxes/transfers
 Economic policy
Note: So far only Government employment has been entered into model, and government production is assumed to be proportional to government employment .
Other production sectors (six sectors from input/output table)
Foreign connections
 Prices - exogenous
 Exchange rate exogenous
 Interest rate - exogenous
 Export volume- endogenous for each firm
 Import volume- endogenous (macro)
 Trade assets and debts (endogenous by firm)
Markets
 Labor market
 Product market
 Financial market (a bank)
Exogenous variables
 Foreign prices: one for each of the four sub markets of manufacturing
Foreign Interest rate:
 Technology: The rate of change in labor productivity of new investment vintages.
 The labor force.
Table 2
Step wise master criteria for statistical fit.
A.Certain macro industry trends approximately right (Within 1/2 percent) over a 20 year period (see trend chart Figure 6).
B.Same trends for the four sub industries.
Same criteria for 5-year period.
C.Micro. Compatible with “stylized facts”. No obvious “misbehavior”.
D.Identify (time reaction) parameters that work uniquely (or roughly so) on cyclical behavior around trends.
Table 3
Calibration procedure (trend fitting)
1. Find first reference case. Assess its performance in terms of A in Table 3.
2a). Perform sensitivity analysis with a view to finding new specifications that improve performance in terms of A.
2b). Ditto with a view to investigating the numerical properties of the model within a normal operating range (analysis). Check and correct if properties can be regarded as unrealistic.
2c). For each new reference case, repeat the whole analysis of 2 b) systematically. The purpose is to ensure, each time, that the new reference case is a better specification and not a statistical coincidence and that the properties of the system revealed by the sensitivity analysis above, and judged to be desirable, are presented in the new reference case.
2d). Subject model to strong shocks. Check for “misbehavior”. (For instance, fast explosive or strong contractive economy wide behavior that have been generated by external shocks that may be considered extreme. If so, ponder the possibility that the model may generate empirically reasonable surprises that have not yet been observed.
3. Define new and better references case. Repeat from 2.
  1. *

    Find first reference case. Assess its performance in terms of A in Table 2.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)