Labour supply and demand

Research articles · Aug 31, 2019

Understanding low female labour force participation: Policy evaluation using microsimulation

Ross Richardson, Lia Pacelli, Matteo Richiardi

Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Universita’ di Torino, and LABORatorio Revelli, Torino, Italy; Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, United Kingdom

Volume 12(2) Summer 2019

Cite as: R. Richardson, L. Pacelli, M. Richiardi; 2019; Understanding low female labour force participation: Policy evaluation using microsimulation; International Journal of Microsimulation; 12(2); 52–68. doi: 10.34196/ijm.00201

Abstract

We project medium to long term trends in labour force participation and employment for selected low-participation EU countries (Italy, Spain, Ireland, Hungary and Greece), with Sweden as a benchmark, by means of a dynamic microsimulation model. By exploring alternative scenarios to our baseline forecasts and their implications for GDP growth, we find that the gap between male and female participation is mostly explained by (i) differences in the individual conditional behaviour of older female cohorts, (ii) inadequate family policies. In particular, our results show that the conditional behaviour of younger women in the low-participation countries is similar to that in Sweden. In a nutshell, what is needed is not a change of behaviour on the side of women but a change of mentality on the side of institutions and firms.

This article contains 8 figures and 7 tables.

Figures

Figure 1. Model structure
Figure 2. Participation rates in the baseline drivers scenarios, female population aged 20–64 years. The shaded areas are the estimated densities of the baseline projections, computed over 1,000 replications with bootstrapped values of the coefficients.
Figure 3. Participation rates in the baseline drivers scenarios, female population aged 20–44 years. The shaded areas are the estimated densities of the baseline projections, computed over 1,000 replications with bootstrapped values of the coefficients.
Figure 4. Participation rates in the policy actions scenarios, female population aged 20–64 years. The shaded areas are the estimated densities of the baseline projections, computed over 1,000 replications with bootstrapped values of the coefficients.
Figure 5. Enhanced family policies scenario: public childcare benefits, duration of maternity leave and availability of part-time employment are jointly increased by 20%. Participation rates by educational attainments, female population aged 20–44 years not in education. The shaded areas are the estimated densities of the baseline projections, computed over 1,000 replications with bootstrapped values of the coefficients.
Figure 6. Decomposition of the Enhanced family policies scenario: public childcare benefits, duration of maternity leave and availability of part-time employment are separately increased by 20%. Participation rates, female population aged 20–44 years with children aged 0–12 years and low education. The shaded areas are the estimated densities of the baseline projections, computed over 1,000 replications with bootstrapped values of the coefficients.
Figure 7. No early retirement scenario: minimum effective retirement age is 60 years old. Employment rates, differential to baseline, population aged 50–59 years.
Figure 8. Delayed recovery scenario: the effects of the Great Recession fade away at a slower pace; complete recovery is achieved 10 years later than in the baseline (so 2040 in Greece and 2030 in other countries). Employment rates, differential to baseline, population aged 20–64.

Tables

Table 1. Determinants of the estimated processes at an individual level. Determinants annotated with (t-1) symbolise that the one-period (one year) lag is used
Outcome Determinants
Student age, gender, region
Education age, gender, region
Consensual union (female only) age, student(t-1), education, participation(t-1), cohabitation(t-1), children(t-1), region, retired(t-1)
Maternity (female only) age, student(t-1), education, participation(t-1), cohabitation(t-1), children(t-1), region, fertility rate, public childcare, maternity benefits, part-time rate
Participation: women with children aged 0–3 inclusive age, student(t-1), education, participation(t-1), cohabitation(t-1), region, public childcare, maternity benefits, part-time rate, post-crisis dummy
Participation: women with children aged 4–12 inclusive age, student(t-1), education, participation(t-1), cohabitation(t-1), region, part-time rate, post-crisis dummy
Participation: women without children aged 0–12 inclusive age, student(t-1), education, participation(t-1), cohabitation(t-1), region, post-crisis dummy
Participation: men age, student(t-1), education, participation(t-1), region, post-crisis dummy
Employment age, gender, student(t-1), education, participation(t-1), unemployment rate, region, post-crisis dummy
Table 2. Projected old-age dependency ratio, baseline scenario
Old-age dependency rates (%)
Year 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050
Ireland 19.8 23.2 30.3 38.6 44.8
Hungary 26.4 30.5 34.4 39.8 47.3
Spain 27.8 30.4 39.6 53.5 62.5
Sweden 31.2 33.0 35.5 37.4 37.5
Greece 31.9 34.3 41.2 53.2 63.6
Italy 33.3 34.9 40.8 49.9 52.9

Source: Eurostat – Population Projections EUROPOP2013.

Table 3. Share of people aged 18–65 years with high (ISCED level 3) and low (ISCED level 1) education, base year
High education (%) Low education (%)
Females Males Females Males
Italy 16.8 13.5 37.3 38.9
Hungary 21.6 15.1 24.8 21.2
Greece 22.8 20.8 35.6 34.2
Spain 30.4 26.6 44.7 48.8
Ireland 33.0 35.3 29.1 34.2
Sweden 38.4 26.5 13.6 17.0
Table 4. Assumptions concerning the mean and standard deviation of retirement age (prior to imposing the minimum retirement age constraint)
Mean retirement age Std. deviation
Year 2015 2030 2050
Males Females Males Females Males Females Males Females
Hungary 61.1 61.8 64.9 65.3 70.0 70.0 5.1 4.1
Greece 62.8 60.0 65.9 64.3 70.0 70.0 5.8 6.2
Spain 63.3 63.8 66.2 66.5 70.0 70.0 4.7 4.5
Italy 64.0 65.9 66.6 67.7 70.0 70.0 6.5 6.6
Ireland 65.8 63.1 67.6 66.0 70.0 70.0 3.5 4.5
Sweden 66.6 65.8 68.0 67.6 70.0 70.0 3.4 3.8
Table 5. Family-policies related parameters, baseline scenario
On leave benefits Public childcare expenditures per child Part-time
Age of child
0 1 2 3
# weeks 2009 US$ PPP %
Greece (EL) 15 154 293 432 571 7.6
Spain (ES) 24 129 1,561 2,996 4,431 12
Hungary (HU) 74 48 78 108 3,045 3.9
Ireland (IE) 12.4 0 0 0 9,384 20.2
Italy (IT) 25 1,017 2,043 3,540 5,286 15.3
Sweden (SE) 74 1,541 2,586 3,630 9,042 24.4

Source: OECD Family Database.

Table 6. Participation rates and participation gaps with respect to Sweden, female population aged 20–64 years, baseline scenario
Females (20–64 years old)
Year 2013 2020 2030 2040 2050
Participation rates (%)
Sweden 86.4 88.3 89.6 89.4 89.7
Spain 70.9 72.3 71.8 73.3 75.5
Hungary 65.1 66.8 70.2 71.3 71.3
Ireland 62.8 69.5 69.6 69.6 72
Greece 62.4 64.1 67.1 70 73
Italy 59.0 63.3 64.7 67 68.8
Participation gap w.r.t. Sweden (%)
Spain 15.5 16.0 17.8 16.1 14.2
Hungary 21.3 21.5 19.4 18.1 18.4
Ireland 23.6 18.8 20.0 19.8 17.7
Greece 24.0 24.2 22.5 19.4 16.7
Italy 27.4 25.0 24.9 22.4 20.9
Table 7. Participation rates and participation gaps with respect to Sweden, female population aged 20–44 years, baseline scenario
Females (20–44 years old)
Year 2013 2020 2030 2040 2050
Participation rates (%)
Sweden 84.2 84.6 86.1 85.1 85.6
Spain 76.8 77.5 73.8 74.5 76.5
Hungary 71.7 73.7 74.3 74.1 74.6
Ireland 68.1 74.4 69.3 68.9 73.6
Greece 66.2 64.1 63.3 62.7 62.1
Italy 64.7 70.8 71.2 71.1 72.1
Participation gap w.r.t. Sweden (%)
Spain 9.6 10.8 15.8 14.9 13.2
Hungary 14.7 14.6 15.3 15.3 15.1
Ireland 18.3 13.9 20.3 20.5 16.1
Greece 20.2 24.2 26.3 26.7 27.6
Italy 21.7 17.5 18.4 18.3 17.6