Browse the search results

Page 5 of 7
    1. Spatial microsimulation

    Measuring small area inequality using spatial microsimulation: Lessons learned from Australia

    Riyana Miranti et al.
    Volume 8(2) Autumn 2015
    1. Methodology

    Data and model cross-validation to improve accuracy of microsimulation results: Estimates for the polish household budget survey

    Michał Myck, Mateusz Najsztub
    Volume 8(1) Spring 2015
    1. Methodology

    New Pathways to Microsimulation, by G. Dekkers, M. Keegan and C. O’Donoghue (2014)

    Denisa Maria Sologon
    Volume 7(3) Winter 2014
    1. Spatial microsimulation

    Modelling the impact of declining Australian terms of trade on the spatial distribution of income

    Yogi Vidyattama et al.
    Volume 7(1) Spring 2014
    1. Methodology
    2. Spatial microsimulation

    Comparing two methods of reweighting a survey file to small area data

    Robert Tanton et al.
    Volume 7(1) Spring 2014
    1. Taxes and benefits

    Taxation of married couples in Germany and the UK: One-Earner Couples Make the Difference

    Stefan Bach et al.
    Volume 6(3) Winter 2013
    1. Methodology

    Testing the Statistical Significance of Microsimulation Results: A Plea

    Tim Goedemé et al.
    Volume 6(3) Winter 2013
    1. Taxes and benefits

    Impact assessment of alternative reforms of child allowances using RUSMOD – the static tax-benefit microsimulation model for Russia

    Daria Popova
    Volume 6(1) Spring 2013
    1. Taxes and benefits

    The importance of choosing the data set for tax-benefit analysis

    Lidia Ceriani et al.
    Volume 6(1) Spring 2013
    1. Taxes and benefits

    EUROMOD: The European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model

    Holly Sutherland, Francesco Figari
    Volume 6(1) Spring 2013
Newer Older